Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 12 March 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 12 MARCH 2015

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment via Video-Link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Annette Treloar
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brodie John Cockshutt
A Witness

For Directions Hearing
Shaun Mathew Dimech

10:30 a.m.
For Trial
Peter Matthew Yost
(Part Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Tony John Pettit
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert John Christiaan Nieuwhof
(Part Heard)

For Plea
Shaun Kevin Sclater

2:15 p.m.
For Plea
David John Hurd

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nicholas Mark Stebbins

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Troy Leslie Eirth
v
Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
A Witness
A Witness
Nathan Scott Davidson
Damien Wesley Marshall
Nathan Henry John Riley
Marco Daniel Rusterholz

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before the FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment via Video-Link to Supreme Court, Burnie
Annette Treloar
v
The State of Tasmania

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Annette Treloar v The State of Tasmania was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, with the Full Court delivering judgment via video-link to the Supreme Court in Burnie. The nature of the dispute involved a claim brought by Treloar against the State of Tasmania. The legal issues that the court was required to decide centred on the scope and application of statutory provisions and the extent of the State's liability in the circumstances presented by Treloar's claim. The court had to interpret relevant legislation and consider whether the State owed a duty of care to Treloar, and if so, whether that duty had been breached, leading to compensable damages.

The court's reasoning involved a detailed examination of the statutory framework and the principles of negligence as they applied to the State's conduct. The justices assessed the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, considering the nature of the State's obligations under the applicable statutes and common law. The outcome of the case was that the court found in favour of the State, concluding that the statutory provisions did not impose the duty of care that Treloar claimed existed, and therefore, the State was not liable for the damages she sought. The reasoning was grounded in the interpretation of the relevant statutes and the established principles of negligence law.

The final orders of the court were that the claim brought by Annette Treloar against the State of Tasmania was dismissed, with no liability found on the part of the State. The judgment was delivered by the Full Court, ensuring that the decision was carefully considered by multiple justices, reflecting the importance and complexity of the issues involved. The dismissal of the claim resulted in Treloar's legal action being concluded, with no compensation awarded.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established