Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 12 December 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 12 DECEMBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Dena Louise Alexopoulos
Katherine Anne Hall
Sonny Day
Carol Anne Devine
Owen James Bonnitcha

For Trial
Rajdeep Singh
(Part-Heard)

Civil Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Mention
Allanby
v
Rowlands & KDM Investments Pty Ltd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Mark Daniel Woolley
Joshua William Kay

2:30 p.m.
For Disputed Facts
PFC
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Remand (By Video-Link)
Shane Mark Ivey
Stephen James Williams
Robert Craig Williams
Mitchell Clay Dowling
Jay David Blazely

For Mention
Clint Graeme Stanisz
Rhiannon Alleshia Harmon
Adam Roy Triffett

For Discharge
Corey Richard Jarman

For Directions Hearing
Leah Jean Woolley
John Prismall
Joshua Daniel Wilson
Shaun Keverall Kaye
Asador Hinsta
Jacinta Lee Kennett

For First Appearance
Marc Ball
Stephen John Jackman
Alister Malcolm Linger
Gregory John Winch
Mathew Peter Young
Michael Anthony Bell

For Bail Application
Mickeal Bechara

For Plea
Dylan Alan Brazendale
Scott James Dickson
BMM
EGR

2.15pm For Sentence
Shane Alfred Baker

For Bail Variation
Ashley Keith Holliday

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Civil Jurisdiction

10.00am For Hearing

Christopher Peter Reissig v. Timothy James Tubb
Timothy James Tubb v. Christopher Peter Reissig

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Mathew James Coventry
BAR
David William Roles
Anthony Colin Finnegan

For Trial (part heard)
Paul Brian Edward Connelly

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a series of hearings in various locations on Thursday, 12 December 2013. The court handled both criminal and civil matters in Hobart and Launceston, presided over by Justice TENNENT and Justice WOOD, respectively. One notable case involved Dena Louise Alexopoulos, Katherine Anne Hall, Sonny Day, Carol Anne Devine, and Owen James Bonnitcha, who were mentioned for trial, while Rajdeep Singh was mentioned for a part-heard trial. In Launceston, the court dealt with several cases, including those of Shane Mark Ivey, Stephen James Williams, Robert Craig Williams, Mitchell Clay Dowling, and Jay David Blazely, who were mentioned for remand by video-link.

The court was required to address several legal issues in these cases, including the management of ongoing trials, sentencing, and the handling of disputed facts. For instance, in the case of Mark Daniel Woolley and Joshua William Kay, the court needed to determine their sentences, while in the case of PFC, the court had to resolve disputed facts. The court also needed to decide on bail applications, bail variations, and pleas in other cases. The handling of these issues involved applying the relevant criminal law principles and considering the specific facts and circumstances of each case.

Justice TENNENT and Justice WOOD provided detailed reasoning in their judgments, focusing on the applicable law and the evidence presented. They carefully considered the arguments made by the parties and the implications of their decisions. The court's outcomes included the continuation of trials, the imposition of sentences, and the resolution of disputed facts. For example, in the case of Mark Daniel Woolley and Joshua William Kay, the court imposed sentences based on the severity of the offences and the defendants' backgrounds. The court's decisions were aimed at ensuring justice was served in each case, taking into account the legal principles and the facts presented.

The final orders of the court varied depending on the specific case. For instance, in some cases, the court ordered the continuation of trials, while in others, it imposed sentences or resolved disputed facts. The court's orders were designed to address the legal issues raised and to ensure that justice was achieved in each matter. The outcomes reflected the court's commitment to upholding the rule of law and providing fair and just resolutions to the disputes before it.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established