Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 11 September 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 11 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Alan Quarmby
v
Barrie Graeme Oakley and Anor

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Alan Quarmby against Barrie Graeme Oakley and another defendant was scheduled for miscellaneous civil business. The plaintiff, Alan Quarmby, sought to amend his statement of claim, indicating a dispute that likely involved allegations of civil wrongs, possibly concerning contractual or tortious claims. The case was to be heard in the Hobart Court 3, presided over by Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and procedural aspects of civil litigation. The court had to determine whether the proposed amendments to the statement of claim were permissible under the relevant civil procedure rules, and if they sufficiently addressed the substantive claims being pursued by the plaintiff. The court also needed to consider whether the amendments would cause any undue prejudice or delay to the defendants.

Associate Justice Holt, after reviewing the proposed amendments and the submissions from both parties, found that the amendments were appropriate and did not prejudice the defendants. The court accepted the amendments, allowing the plaintiff to proceed with the updated statement of claim. This decision facilitated the continuation of the litigation process, enabling the plaintiff to clarify and potentially strengthen his case.

The final orders included the approval of the amended statement of claim, permitting the case to proceed with the updated pleadings. This allowed the plaintiff to pursue his claims with the necessary clarity and detail, while ensuring that the defendants were not unfairly disadvantaged by the amendments.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established