SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 11 APRIL 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Allan William Jones
For Trial
Meaganne Glover
(Part Heard)
2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Verriece Aileen McLean
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Jose Alberto Castaneda
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
Senior Constable Andrew Peter Morton
v
Loretta Anne Brooks
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
12.00 p.m.
For Hearing
Aquagenics Pty Limited
v
Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation (Southern Region) Pty Limited
(Part-Heard)
4.00 p.m.
R414 Directions Hearing by telephone
DL & EM Lunson Pty Ltd
v
United Petroleum Pty Ltd
4.15 p.m.
Pre Trial Conference by telephone
Lewis
v
Rickets
4.30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
French
v
McKenna
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
John Charles Shegog
Glen Bamford
Luke John Smith
BBWF
Mark William Flanagan
Louise Jane Williams
For Trial
Emily Jane Thompson
10.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Terence Williams
BURNIE
No list for Burnie until further notice
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 11 April 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 56
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 56
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to address a range of legal issues, from criminal proceedings to civil disputes. In the criminal cases, the court needed to determine whether the defendants were guilty of the charges brought against them and, if so, the appropriate sentence. In the civil cases, the court was tasked with resolving disputes over contractual obligations, damages, and other civil matters. Each case presented its own set of facts and legal questions that the court had to carefully consider in reaching its decisions.
In the reasoning provided, the court detailed its approach to each case, considering the evidence presented and the applicable laws. The outcomes varied, with some defendants being found guilty and sentenced, while others had their cases adjourned or settled out of court. The civil cases also resulted in various outcomes, with some disputes being resolved through settlement or court orders. The court's decisions were based on a thorough examination of the evidence and legal arguments presented.
The final orders included sentences for convicted defendants, adjournments for ongoing cases, and resolutions for civil disputes. The court ensured that justice was served in each case according to the law and the specific circumstances presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.