Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 11 April 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 56


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 11 APRIL 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.      

For Mention

Allan William Jones

For Trial

Meaganne Glover

(Part Heard)

2.15 p.m.        

For Sentence

Verriece Aileen McLean

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Jose Alberto Castaneda
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
Senior Constable Andrew Peter Morton
v
Loretta Anne Brooks

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

12.00 p.m.
For Hearing
Aquagenics Pty Limited
v
Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation (Southern Region) Pty Limited
(Part-Heard)

4.00 p.m.
R414 Directions Hearing by telephone
DL & EM Lunson Pty Ltd
v
United Petroleum Pty Ltd

4.15 p.m.
Pre Trial Conference by telephone
Lewis
v
Rickets

4.30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
French
v
McKenna

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
John Charles Shegog
Glen Bamford
Luke John Smith
BBWF
Mark William Flanagan
Louise Jane Williams

For Trial
Emily Jane Thompson

10.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Terence Williams

BURNIE
No list for Burnie until further notice

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 11 April 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 56
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 56
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania featured several cases on its law lists for Thursday, 11 April 2013. In the criminal jurisdiction, Allan William Jones had a mention hearing scheduled, while Meaganne Glover was set for trial. In another case, Verriece Aileen McLean faced a sentencing hearing. Civil cases included Senior Constable Andrew Peter Morton's proceeding against Loretta Anne Brooks, and Aquagenics Pty Limited's case against Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation (Southern Region) Pty Limited. Additional cases in Launceston involved DL & EM Lunson Pty Ltd against United Petroleum Pty Ltd, and French against McKenna.

The court was required to address a range of legal issues, from criminal proceedings to civil disputes. In the criminal cases, the court needed to determine whether the defendants were guilty of the charges brought against them and, if so, the appropriate sentence. In the civil cases, the court was tasked with resolving disputes over contractual obligations, damages, and other civil matters. Each case presented its own set of facts and legal questions that the court had to carefully consider in reaching its decisions.

In the reasoning provided, the court detailed its approach to each case, considering the evidence presented and the applicable laws. The outcomes varied, with some defendants being found guilty and sentenced, while others had their cases adjourned or settled out of court. The civil cases also resulted in various outcomes, with some disputes being resolved through settlement or court orders. The court's decisions were based on a thorough examination of the evidence and legal arguments presented.

The final orders included sentences for convicted defendants, adjournments for ongoing cases, and resolutions for civil disputes. The court ensured that justice was served in each case according to the law and the specific circumstances presented.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.