Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday 10 May 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY 10 MAY 2012

HOBART LIST

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
Interlocutory Application
Jon Wheaton Trading as MMS Renovations (A division of Marketing Management Services)
v
Rosa La Capra & Michael La Capra

For Hearing
Terence David Howroyd
v
Richard John Howroyd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Applications
Jamie Penneyston
Aaron Grant
(Part Heard)

4.15 p.m.
In Court
For Sentence
Christopher James Gerrard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.00 a.m.
Woods
V
Eaton
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

No law list

BURNIE

No law list

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear a variety of cases on Thursday, 10 May 2012. One of the cases was an interlocutory application brought by Jon Wheaton, trading as MMS Renovations, against Rosa La Capra and Michael La Capra. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the document, but it was set for hearing before the full court at 10:00 a.m. Another case listed for the same day was a criminal matter involving Terence David Howroyd suing Richard John Howroyd, which was set for hearing in Court 8 at 10:00 a.m. Additionally, there were bail applications and sentencing proceedings scheduled throughout the day.

The legal issues that the court needed to address in the cases mentioned included the merits and procedures of the interlocutory application in the civil case, as well as the criminal charges in the Howroyd case. The court would need to consider the evidence presented and the applicable legal standards to decide on the outcomes of these cases. The full court's decision on the interlocutory application and the outcome of the criminal case would be pivotal in determining the next steps in these legal matters.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not provided in the document. However, the full court's decision on the interlocutory application in the civil case and the criminal charges in the Howroyd case were expected to be significant in guiding the proceedings. The court's analysis would involve a thorough examination of the legal arguments and evidence, with a focus on ensuring a fair and just resolution in accordance with the law. The final orders in these cases would reflect the court's determinations based on the presented evidence and legal principles.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established