Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 10 December 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 10 DECEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Shaun Kevin Sclater
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Klaus Dieter Neubert
Samuel David Pennicott
James Michael Fitzgerald
Mark Brian McLaren
Lee-Anne Marie Levett
Brendan Lee Jones
Leigh William Moses

For Bail Consent
James Phillip Wright
PKF

EAE

GIM

GOO

In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Variation
Jarrod Leigh Turner
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst

For Bail Application
Paul Leslie Triffett
Craig Anthony Devine
Christopher Craig Banks
Craig Anthony Montgomery
Kylie Maree Herlihy
Michael Thomas Jones

2:15 p.m.
In Court
For Mention/Plea
Jenna Lee Emery

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Directions Hearing

Royden Sydney Bevin Swan

Emma Joan Swan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart (via Video Link to Supreme Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston)
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ramon Jon Williams
Scott Bevan Lucas
Ethen Wayne Nicholls (AKA Prem)
Paul Lance Broad
Alexandra Rose Lockwood
Michael Rigby
Jamie Michael Richards
Adam Jacob Shepherd
Scott Ian Steuart
Erich Leonard Ungerhofer
Peter Michael Kopper
Daniel James Leech
Jeremy Benjamin Auld
Ryan Terrance Williams
Justin Joseph Ewell

For Sentence/ Mention
Anthony Charles Mare

For Mention/ Bail Application
Christo Brown

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

4.15 p.m.

For Sentence
Hayden Charles Bannister

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Alexander William Head

To Follow
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Matthew Mark Parkinson

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Darren John Fenton
v
Sergeant Richard Lane & Anor

Senior Sergeant John Parker
v
Adrian John Hall

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:30 a.m.
For Application for Possession
Pepper Finance Corporation
v
K & G Investments (Tas) Pty Ltd

In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
A Legal Practitioner

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Asim Mujkic
v
Steve Gladman as liquidator of Mujkic Family Company Pty Ltd

3:00 p.m. via video link
Set Aside Judgment
Gunns Plantations Limited (In Liquidation)
v
Hilton Paul

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am In Court For Mention via Video Link
Ramon Jon Williams
Scott Bevan Lucas
Ethen Wayne Nicholls (AKA Prem)

To Follow For Mention
Paul Lance Broad
Alexandra Rose Lockwood
Michael Rigby
Jamie Michael Richards
Adam Jacob Shepherd
Scott Ian Steuart
Erich Leonard Ungerhofer
Peter Michael Kopper
Daniel James Leech
Jeremy Benjamin Auld
Ryan Terrance Williams
Justin Joseph Ewell

To Follow For Sentence/ Mention
Anthony Charles Mare

To Follow Mention / Bail Application
Christo Brown

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was set to hear a range of cases on Thursday, 10 December 2015. In Court 7, the Court of Criminal Appeal was scheduled to deliver judgment in the case of Shaun Kevin Sclater versus the State of Tasmania. This appeal likely involved questions of criminal law or procedure, given the nature of the court.

The legal issues in this case would have focused on the interpretation of criminal law or procedural errors that could have affected the outcome of the lower court's decision. The Court of Criminal Appeal would have examined whether the trial was conducted fairly and whether any legal principles were misapplied. The judgment would hinge on whether the appeal was substantiated on legal grounds, such as errors in the admission of evidence, misdirection of the jury, or procedural irregularities.

The court's reasoning and outcome would have been detailed in the judgment delivered that day. If the appeal was successful, the court would have quashed or varied the decision of the lower court, potentially leading to a retrial or release of the appellant. The final orders would have been made based on the court's findings, and these would have been communicated to the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established