Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 10 April 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 10 APRIL 2014

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:45 p.m.
Via video link to court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Sentence
Jonathon William Glover

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Variation
Via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Matthew James Coventry

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Barry Douglas Hazelwood

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Cameron James Brasher

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Maxwell Alexander Jacques
Adrian Ramond Nattey

For Plea
Cameron Desmond Heather
Clay Xavier Savage
Terrence James Burn
Jamie Reginald Hall
Garry Scott Sullivan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Sentence
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00am
For Mention
Nathan Henry John Riley
Mathew Peter Young
Leigh Anthony Neil
Robert Craig Williams
Stephen James Williams

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Shane Mark Ivey
Darryl Scott Donohue
Issa Michael Emami

For Plea
John Nicholas Etchell
Troy Mathew Furley

Not before 11:30am
For Mention
Jay David Blazely
Mitchell Clay Dowling

2:15pm For Sentence
Joseph John Stewart
Brooke Erin Stewart

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Variation via video-link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Matthew James Coventry

4:00pm For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Barry Douglas Hazelwood

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Cameron James Brasher

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
4:45 p.m.
For Sentence (via video link from court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
Jonathon William Glover

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 10 April 2014, detail a range of criminal and civil proceedings scheduled in various locations across the state, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The listed cases involve both sentencing and bail applications, with some hearings conducted via video link to accommodate the remote presence of parties. Notable cases include the sentencing of Jonathon William Glover, Barry Douglas Hazelwood, and Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey, all of which were scheduled in different locations, demonstrating the court's flexibility in handling cases through video conferencing to ensure accessibility and efficiency.

The legal issues presented in these cases primarily revolve around the appropriate sentencing and bail variations for individuals convicted of various criminal offences. The court had to consider the nature and severity of the crimes, the offenders' backgrounds, and any mitigating or aggravating factors that could influence the sentencing. Additionally, for bail applications and variations, the court assessed the risk of the accused reoffending, their ties to the community, and the likelihood of them appearing in court if released on bail.

The court's reasoning and outcome in these cases were based on a careful examination of each individual's circumstances. For sentencing, the court aimed to impose penalties that were proportionate to the crimes committed, taking into account any legal arguments presented by the defence and the prosecution. In cases of bail applications and variations, the court evaluated the risk factors to the community and the individual's likelihood of complying with bail conditions. The outcomes varied, with some applications being granted or denied based on the specific details of each case.

No specific final orders are detailed in the text, but it is clear that the court made decisions on each case based on the evidence and arguments presented. The court's decisions on sentencing and bail reflect its role in administering justice in a manner that considers both the rights of the accused and the safety of the community.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established