Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 9 September 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 191


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 9 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
The Queen
v
Russell David Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd
(Part-heard)

3:30 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
Dawn Ruth Flower

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
JWA

For Trial: To Empanel Jury Only
Gary Alan Dowling
Danny Ian Cheeseman

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Brodie Leigh Price
(Part-heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Re Witnesses
For Bail Consent
Sally Karen Steers

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30pm
For Directions Hearing by video link from
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Lokendra Singh

LAUNCESTON

COURT 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Brett Andrew Kitchin
Jacob Andrew Williams
Josh Daniel Wilson
Linda Lee Jones
Tiffany Louise Shaw
MNH

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Gregory Richardson
Damien Wesley Marshall

In Court as in Chambers
4.00pm For Bail Application
Malcolm Joshua Mayne
Sean Gregory Richardson

COURT 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Remand
Jesse Kaylon Burling

To Follow For Mention
Lokendra Singh
Cameron John Capodici

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Louise Jane Williams

4:15pm For Sentence
Steven John Henderson

For Sentence by video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Liam Anthony Edwards

4:30pm For Directions Hearing by video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lokendra Singh

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence by video link from
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Liam Anthony Edwards

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 9 September 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 191
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 191
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had a variety of criminal cases scheduled for Monday, 9 September 2015. Notable cases included a trial for Russell David Potter, who was being prosecuted by Mures Fishing Pty Ltd. Another case was the plea in mitigation for Dawn Ruth Flower. Further down the list, there was a bail consent application for JWA, followed by a trial for Gary Alan Dowling and Danny Ian Cheeseman. Brodie Leigh Price's trial was also scheduled, with mention regarding witnesses.

The court faced several legal issues, such as determining the guilt or innocence of the defendants in the various trials. The plea in mitigation would require the court to consider any mitigating factors presented by the defence. Bail applications involved assessing the risk of flight or interference with witnesses if the accused were released. Sentencing hearings would necessitate consideration of the appropriate penalties based on the nature of the offence and the circumstances surrounding it.

The reasoning and outcome of the court's decisions would depend on the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by the parties. For trials, the court would need to decide if the prosecution had proven the charges beyond reasonable doubt. In plea in mitigation, the court would weigh any mitigating factors presented by the defence. Bail applications would involve assessing the risk factors and the likelihood of the accused appearing in court if released. Sentencing would require the court to determine an appropriate penalty that reflects the seriousness of the offence and any mitigating or aggravating factors.

No final orders were mentioned in the list, but it is expected that the court would issue appropriate orders following the conclusion of each case. These orders could include findings of guilt or acquittal, sentences, bail conditions, or directions for further proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.