Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 7 July 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 7 JULY 2014

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Gardner and Anor
v
Gardner and Anor

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
New Bounty Pty Ltd and Anor
v
Winpar Holdings and Ors

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania was a criminal case involving Stephen Roy Standage. The case was part-heard on the 7th of July, 2014, before Justice Estcourt in the Criminal Jurisdiction. The nature of the dispute was a criminal proceeding against Standage, with specific details of the charges not provided in the court listing.

The legal issues that the court needed to decide pertained to the evidence presented in the trial and the application of criminal law to the facts of the case. Justice Estcourt was tasked with determining whether the prosecution had sufficiently proven the charges against Standage beyond reasonable doubt and what the appropriate sentence would be if the defendant was found guilty.

In the reasoning provided, Justice Estcourt would have evaluated the evidence presented, the credibility of witnesses, and the legal arguments from both the prosecution and the defence. The outcome of the hearing would have been the continuation of the trial, with further evidence likely to be presented and examined. The court's decision on the charges and the sentence, if any, would follow once all the evidence had been considered and the legal principles applied.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the listing and would have been communicated separately, potentially including a verdict and sentence if the trial was concluded during this sitting or a scheduling of further hearings if the trial continued beyond this date.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established