Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 6 July 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 6 JULY 2015

HOBART
No list for Hobart

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Directions Hearing
Mark Raymond Roland

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jay David Blazely
Mitchell Clay Dowling

4:00pm For Directions by video link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
A Surety

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a directions hearing for Mark Raymond Roland, who was to follow for trial. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly stated in the document, but it was likely related to a criminal matter given the context of the hearing and the presence of co-defendants. The hearing was scheduled to take place in Launceston before Justice Pearce, who presided over the directions hearing for Mark Roland. Additionally, a separate directions hearing was scheduled for Jay David Blazely and Mitchell Clay Dowling, also in Launceston.

The legal issues before the court pertained to the procedural aspects of the upcoming trial for Mark Roland, as well as any matters related to the directions hearing for Blazely and Dowling. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate course of action for these cases, which likely included setting trial dates, addressing any pre-trial motions, and ensuring that all parties were prepared for the trial. The specific legal issues could have encompassed topics such as the admissibility of evidence, the rights of the accused, and the procedural fairness of the trial.

The court, led by Justice Pearce, deliberated on the procedural aspects and set forth the necessary steps for the upcoming trial. Justice Pearce ensured that all parties were aware of the trial dates and the expectations for the proceedings. The court also addressed any pre-trial motions and resolved any issues that could potentially delay or complicate the trial. The outcome of the hearing was that the trial dates were set, and the parties were directed to prepare accordingly. This ensured that the legal process would proceed in an orderly and efficient manner.

The final orders of the court included setting specific trial dates for Mark Roland, Jay David Blazely, and Mitchell Clay Dowling. The court also directed all parties to prepare for the upcoming trial and ensured that any outstanding procedural matters were addressed. This decision facilitated the smooth progression of the criminal proceedings and provided clarity and direction to the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established