SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 30 APRIL 2012
HOBART LIST
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
RBG
For Mention
Hayden Larner
Patricia Dawn Baines
For Facts and Sentence
Tara Maree Magee
2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video Link
Steven Kevin Jones
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Damon John Temple
For Trial
TCT
(part-heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
TLD
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m.
Objection to Subpoenas
Sharp
V
Aguilar
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
MAJ
Christopher John Humphreys
Tiffany Lee Jones
Jamie Lee Vimpany
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Timothy Hudson
Neville Lindsay Whiting
In Court As In Chambers
4.00pm For Bail Application
Joseph Freeman
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Chief Justice
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Patricia Mary Ann Woodberry
Brett Douglas Scott
Tina Louise Jackson
Roslyn Julie Connolly
Anthony Michael Mulkearns
To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Robin John Jago
Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 30 April 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 69
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 69
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases varied, but likely included matters such as the admissibility of evidence, the sufficiency of charges, sentencing principles, and procedural issues relating to subpoenas. The court would have had to consider the applicable law and legal principles to determine the appropriate outcomes for each matter. The Supreme Court of Tasmania is the highest court in the state and has both criminal and civil jurisdiction, so the cases before it could involve a range of legal issues. The reasoning and outcome of each case would have depended on the specific facts and legal arguments presented.
The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard arguments and made decisions on the various matters listed on its law list for 30 April 2012. The outcomes would have been based on the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to each case. For example, in criminal cases, the court would have considered whether the prosecution had proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt, while in civil cases, the court would have assessed the merits of any objections to subpoenas. The Supreme Court of Tasmania would have applied the relevant law to reach its decisions, which may have involved dismissing charges, allowing appeals, or making orders in relation to sentencing or procedural matters. The final orders of the court would have been recorded in the official court records.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.