Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 30 April 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 69


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 30 APRIL 2012

HOBART LIST
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
RBG

For Mention
Hayden Larner
Patricia Dawn Baines

For Facts and Sentence
Tara Maree Magee

2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video Link
Steven Kevin Jones

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Damon John Temple

For Trial
TCT 
(part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
TLD 

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m.
Objection to Subpoenas
Sharp
V
Aguilar

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
MAJ
Christopher John Humphreys
Tiffany Lee Jones
Jamie Lee Vimpany

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Timothy Hudson
Neville Lindsay Whiting

In Court As In Chambers
4.00pm For Bail Application
Joseph Freeman

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Chief Justice
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Patricia Mary Ann Woodberry
Brett Douglas Scott
Tina Louise Jackson
Roslyn Julie Connolly
Anthony Michael Mulkearns

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Robin John Jago

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 30 April 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 69
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 69
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania listed several criminal and civil matters on Monday, 30 April 2012. In the criminal division, Hayden Larner and Patricia Dawn Baines had cases listed for mention, while Tara Maree Magee was scheduled for sentencing. The court also heard a part-heard trial involving Damon John Temple, and a sentencing matter for a defendant identified as TLD. In the civil division, an objection to subpoenas was listed before Associate Justice Holt. The Launceston court had several criminal cases listed, including mentions for MAJ, Christopher John Humphreys, and Tiffany Lee Jones, as well as a part-heard trial involving Jamie Lee Vimpany and Sean Timothy Hudson. A bail application for Joseph Freeman was scheduled in Burnie before the Chief Justice. The Supreme Court of Tasmania also had a case listed for mention in Burnie involving Patricia Mary Ann Woodberry, Brett Douglas Scott, Tina Louise Jackson, Roslyn Julie Connolly, and Anthony Michael Mulkearns, with a part-heard trial to follow for Robin John Jago.

The legal issues in these cases varied, but likely included matters such as the admissibility of evidence, the sufficiency of charges, sentencing principles, and procedural issues relating to subpoenas. The court would have had to consider the applicable law and legal principles to determine the appropriate outcomes for each matter. The Supreme Court of Tasmania is the highest court in the state and has both criminal and civil jurisdiction, so the cases before it could involve a range of legal issues. The reasoning and outcome of each case would have depended on the specific facts and legal arguments presented.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard arguments and made decisions on the various matters listed on its law list for 30 April 2012. The outcomes would have been based on the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to each case. For example, in criminal cases, the court would have considered whether the prosecution had proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt, while in civil cases, the court would have assessed the merits of any objections to subpoenas. The Supreme Court of Tasmania would have applied the relevant law to reach its decisions, which may have involved dismissing charges, allowing appeals, or making orders in relation to sentencing or procedural matters. The final orders of the court would have been recorded in the official court records.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.