SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 29 SEPTEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Mathew Eduardo Homem De Gouveia
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Hongbing Zhao and Anor
v
The Assessment Committee for Dam Construction (ACDC) of Tasmania
LAUNCESTON
No law list for Launceston
BURNIE
No law list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 29 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 200
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 200
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the applicant's academic qualifications, professional experience, and character references. The evidence presented demonstrated that Mr De Gouveia had completed the requisite law degree and practical legal training. Additionally, his character references were positive, indicating that he possessed the moral and ethical standards required for legal practice. After considering all the evidence, the court was satisfied that Mr De Gouveia met the criteria for admission to the legal profession.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Tasmania granted Mr De Gouveia's application for admission to the legal profession. The court recognised his academic achievements, practical training, and positive character assessments as sufficient to warrant his entry into the profession. Mr De Gouveia is now entitled to practise law in Tasmania, subject to any further conditions imposed by the Law Society of Tasmania.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.