Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 29 June 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 29 JUNE 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:15 a.m.
For Judgment
Paul Brian Edward Connelly
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:45 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Stephen Roy Standage
v
State of Tasmania

4:15 pm
For Sentence
Denise Michele Morrissey

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Hobart Reception Prison
David Luke Pearson

For Discharge
Katie Anne Addison
Phillip Andrew Young
Derek William Denny
Greg James Douglas

For Mention
Patrick John Daly
Kyam Keith Broadby
RM
Jarrod Leigh Turner
Terrence James Burns
Wayne Michael Lang
SJB
A Witness
A Witness

Not Before 10:15 a.m.
For Plea

AALC

For Plea
Natasha Lee Scott
Benjamin Angus Shield

For Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence
Anthony Michael Lincoln

For Bail Consent

Joseph Aaron Lattimer

Mark Douglas Cooper

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
BJC

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Geoffrey Peter Radloff

For Mention
Christy Marie Lord

For Bail Consent
Dawn Ruth Flower
Robin Thomas Flower
Gary Alan Dowling
Danny Ian Cheeseman

For Trial
Denis Ross Tringrove
Robin Glen Fahey
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Simon John Maurice Taafe
Cody David Brown

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For Bail Application by Video Link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kristam Targett

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
v
Susan Burge
LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Remand by Video Link
John Benjamin Adams
MNH

To Follow For Remand
Robert Craig Williams
Stephen James Williams
Tristan Andrew Tuthill

To Follow For Bail Consent
Paul John Warren
Christopher John Glen Walker
Steven John Barr

11:00am For Bail Variation
Katarzyna Wanda Stadnicka

To Follow For Plea in Mitigation
Luke James Reader
Christina Vernessa Watson

4:00pm For Sentence
Anton Maxwell Crawford

4:15pm For Bail Application by Video Link
to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kristam Targett

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:45 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Supreme Court, 38 Alexander Street, Burnie
Stephen Roy Standage
v
State of Tasmania

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania provided a list of cases to be heard on Monday, 29 June 2015. The cases ranged from criminal to civil matters, with various stages of proceedings including judgments, directions hearings, sentences, mentions, and bail applications. In the Court of Criminal Appeal, Paul Brian Edward Connelly was scheduled for judgment against the State of Tasmania. This case involved a significant criminal matter, likely an appeal against a conviction or sentence. Another criminal case, Stephen Roy Standage against the State of Tasmania, was listed for a directions hearing via video link. This case involved procedural issues and was to be addressed in a remote session.

The legal issues in these cases included the validity of the conviction or sentence in the appeal, procedural fairness in the handling of the case, and the appropriate sentence to be imposed. The court needed to determine whether the appeal had merit, whether the procedural steps were correctly followed, and what sentence was appropriate given the circumstances of the case. The reasoning of the court would be based on the evidence presented, legal precedents, and the statutes applicable to the cases. The outcome would depend on the court's interpretation of the law and facts.

The final orders would be communicated after the respective hearings. In criminal cases, this could range from upholding or overturning a conviction, setting a new sentence, or directing further proceedings. In civil matters, the court might rule on the liability of the parties, the amount of damages, or other remedies. The orders would provide clarity and resolution to the legal disputes presented.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established