Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 28 May 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 91


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 28 MAY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Via video link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Launceston
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment

Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin & Ors

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Shane John Hammond
Hayden Larner
Tara Maree Magee
Anthony Wayne Emery
Ashley Dean Brown

For Trial
Bryan Peter Connolly
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application
James Stewart Walker
Adam Noel Baker

For Further Directions Hearing
Ian Paul Pettman

For Trial
Patricia Dawn Baines

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Ashton Frederick Jones

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Jesse James Whitford

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
In court as in Chambers
Chamber Matter

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Extend Time
Tiedemann
V
Motor Accidents Insurance Board & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford 

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Shaun Keverall Kaye

For Trial
CCH

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Evans by video link from Court 7, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Civil Jurisdiction
9.45am for Judgment
Clarence City Council  v.  Darryl Robert Howlin & Ors.

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.   For
Mention
Scott Thomas Clarke

Tanya Maree Howard
Zannon Tony Howard

JWT

Michael Anthony Jones

For Preliminary Proceedings
Craig Ronald Jones

For Facts
Peter William Leary

For Plea
Brian Lyle Clarke

In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application

Thomas Rundle Mead

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 28 May 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 91
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 91
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 28 May 2012, include a variety of civil and criminal cases across different locations in Tasmania. Among these, a notable case involves Clarence City Council versus Darryl Robert Howlin and others, scheduled for judgment in Court 7 in Hobart. This case likely pertains to a dispute involving municipal matters, such as zoning, property rights, or local government decisions, given the involvement of a city council.

The legal issues in this case may revolve around interpretations of local ordinances, statutory compliance, and the rights of property owners against municipal decisions. The court will have to determine whether the actions of the Clarence City Council were lawful, justified, and in accordance with relevant legislative frameworks. Additionally, the case might involve questions of procedural fairness and the extent of the council's authority in making certain decisions.

Justice Evans, presiding over the case in Hobart, will consider these legal issues based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The outcome will depend on the interpretation of local laws, the specifics of the council's actions, and the rights of the defendants. The court's judgment will likely provide clarity on the scope and limits of municipal powers, as well as the legal avenues available to property owners contesting council decisions.

Pending the judgment, the final orders of the court will detail the outcome and any necessary actions or remedies. This could include affirming, reversing, or modifying the council's decision, awarding costs, or directing further proceedings. The judgment will serve as a significant reference for similar cases involving municipal governance and property rights in Tasmania.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.