Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 27 July 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 27 JULY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Trial
9:30 a.m.
Dawn Ruth Flower
Robin Thomas Flower
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Shayden James Cowen

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
David Luke Pearson

For Bail Consent
Stephen Paul Hamilton

For Trial
Joseph Aaron Lattimer

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Wayne Michael Lang

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Steven John Brear

Dean Phillip Braslin

JSWR

For Trial

Leah Lesley Cannon

(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Porter
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:45 a.m.
For Application
Peter John Leary and Anor
v
Lipscombe Child Care Services Inc

In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Craig Andrew O’Neill
v
Natasha Rhodes
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Steven John Barr
Paul John Warren

For Trial
MNH

Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:00pm For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
JSKRM

To Follow For Bail Application
Ramon Williams
Tyson Lee Hannah

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction

10am for Mention
Nicholas Mark Anderson

For Trial
Mark Raymond Roland

4.15pm for Sentence
Mark Adrian Wicks

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Monday, 27 July 2015, with various cases scheduled across multiple courts and jurisdictions. In Hobart, Court 7, presided over by Chief Justice Blow, had several criminal cases listed for trial, mention, and bail applications. Meanwhile, in the same city, Court 8, before Justice Tennant, had criminal and civil cases scheduled, including a part-heard trial. In Launceston, Court 1, presided over by Justice Estcourt, handled criminal mentions and trials. Additionally, Burnie Court 1, before Justice Pearce, had a mention and a trial scheduled.

The legal issues addressed in the various cases likely ranged from the admissibility of evidence in criminal trials to the interpretation of contractual obligations in civil proceedings. Each case would have required the court to navigate specific legal principles relevant to the nature of the dispute, such as the rules of evidence, criminal law statutes, or contract law. The outcome of each case would have hinged on how these legal issues were interpreted and applied by the respective judges.

The reasoning and outcomes of the cases would have been detailed in the court's written judgments or orders, which would be available for review by the parties involved and legal practitioners. These judgments would provide clarity on how the court resolved the specific legal issues raised in each case, offering guidance for future similar matters. The final orders would reflect the court's determination on the merits of each case, including any sentences, compensation, or other remedies awarded.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established