Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 24 November 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 24 NOVEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For admission to the legal profession
James Frederick Hudson

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Leah Lesley Cannon

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Zachary Jacob Jones
Robert John Smith
Joseph Andrew Edwards
Paul Victor Marshall

For Application to Review
Nicole Maree McGowan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Julie Louise Rowbottom
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment via video link to Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Roger Wayne Calvert
v
Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am for Mention
Damien Wesley Marshall
Sean Gregory Richardson

For Directions
Lokendra Singh

For Trial
Darryl Scott Donohue

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment (via videolink from Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
Roger Wayne Calvert
v
Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Adrian John Hall

BURNIE
No list available at time of publication

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Monday, 24 November 2014, the Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session in Hobart, presided over by Chief Justice Blow. The court was set to address a variety of cases, ranging from civil to criminal matters, and some involving applications and mentions. One notable case involved a civil matter where Roger Wayne Calvert was seeking judgment against Robert Badenach and Murdoch Clarke Solicitors. This case was scheduled for judgment, with a video link set up to facilitate proceedings from Launceston.

The legal issues before the court were diverse and included admissions to the legal profession, trials, mentions, applications for review, and judgments. The court was tasked with handling these cases in a manner that adhered to the principles of justice and legal procedure. The primary focus was on ensuring that each case received the appropriate judicial attention and that the rights of all parties involved were upheld.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case varied according to the specific legal issues presented. For the civil matter involving Roger Wayne Calvert, the court was expected to deliver a judgment that addressed the claims made by Calvert against the solicitors. The court's decision would be based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, ensuring that the legal principles were correctly applied. The court's role was to provide a fair and reasoned decision that resolved the dispute in line with the law.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the document, but they would typically include any judgments, rulings on applications, or directives for further proceedings as deemed necessary. Each case was handled with due consideration of the legal framework and the rights of the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established