Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 24 March 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 24 MARCH 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

For Trial
Jamie Reginald Hall
Garry Scott Sullivan

(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Rodney Charles Cuthbert
Adam Paul Alexander

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Kimberley Kate Heap

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Michael Francis Parke
v
Damien Johnson

4:15 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Directions
Neil Perry
v
Megan Francis Townsend & Dobson Mitchell & Allport Pty Ltd

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 am
For Mention
In the Matter of the Legal Profession Act and in the Matter of an Application by Joanne Frances Matthews

For Trial
Alicia Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Gunns Limited (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (In liquidation)
v
Griggs & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention

Joseph John Stewart
Brooke Erin Stewart

For Discharge
Craig Michael Watts

For Bail Consent
Michael Anthony Bell

For Trial
Shane Vivian Smith

4:15pm For Sentence
Paul Anthony Madden

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
11.00 am
For Mention
Adam James Orme

For Trial (part heard)
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Monday, 24 March 2014, several cases were listed for hearing across various courts in Tasmania. In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, several criminal and civil cases were scheduled. The criminal cases included a part-heard trial involving Jamie Reginald Hall and Garry Scott Sullivan, and mentions regarding Rodney Charles Cuthbert and Adam Paul Alexander. The civil cases involved hearings for admission to the legal profession, a hearing in a dispute between Michael Francis Park and Damien Johnson, and a directions hearing in a case between Neil Perry and Megan Francis Townsend, as well as Dobson Mitchell & Allport Pty Ltd. In Launceston, criminal cases were listed for mention, discharge, bail consent, trial, and sentencing.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide varied across the cases. In the criminal cases, the court needed to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused individuals based on the evidence presented. In the civil cases, the court had to address matters such as admission to the legal profession, resolution of disputes between parties, and directions in ongoing litigation. The specific legal principles and precedents that would apply to each case would depend on the facts and arguments presented by the parties involved.

The court's reasoning and outcome would be specific to each case and would be detailed in the court's written reasons or judgment. The court would consider the evidence and arguments presented by the parties, apply relevant legal principles, and make a decision based on the facts of the case. The outcome could range from a finding of guilt or innocence in criminal cases, to a resolution of the dispute in civil cases, to directions for further proceedings. The court's decision would be binding on the parties involved and could have legal consequences for them.

Any final orders made by the court would be detailed in the court's written reasons or judgment. These orders could include convictions and sentences in criminal cases, as well as resolutions of disputes and directions for further proceedings in civil cases. The orders would be binding on the parties involved and would have legal consequences for them. The court's decision and orders would be subject to appeal to a higher court, if applicable.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established