Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 23 June 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 23 JUNE 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Dean Andrew Mazey
Trysten Anthony Bennett
Beau Vaughan Plowman

For Bail Consent
Mark William Eather

For Trial
Christopher Wayne Wakefield

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

2.00pm
For Mention
Anthony Robert Hawkins

In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Gavin Daniel Hornberg
Jai Craig Nichols

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Klobusiak
v
Booth

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Remand
Adrian John Pryer
Brady Allan Pyke

For Trial
JCS

4:00pm for Sentence
Renee Joy Payne

For Plea
Samantha Ashley Prewer

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. (not before 11:00 a.m.)
For Mention
Paul James Coppleman
v
Jessica Marree Godfrey

Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Mention
Andrew Denis Dare
Jodie Helen Connelly
Leigh Mathew Bourke

For Trial
Nicole Margaret Bruce

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, in its sitting on 23 June 2014, handled a variety of criminal and civil cases across multiple courts and locations. In Hobart, Justice Porter presided over criminal cases involving individuals such as Dean Andrew Mazey, Trysten Anthony Bennett, and Beau Vaughan Plowman, with proceedings ranging from bail applications to trials. The court also heard a case involving Christopher Wayne Wakefield. In another session before Justice Estcourt, the court dealt with bail applications for Gavin Daniel Hornberg and Jai Craig Nichols, and a part-heard trial for Stephen Roy Standage. Launceston and Burnie courts also handled a mix of criminal and civil cases, including sentencing and pleas, as well as mentions and trials.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal matters, including bail applications, remand hearings, trials, and sentencing. For the civil cases, the focus was on hearings and mentions, with some cases involving disputes between individuals. The court had to consider the merits of each case, applying relevant legal principles and statutes to determine appropriate outcomes for each matter.

The court's reasoning in each case would have been guided by the specific facts presented, applicable legal standards, and precedent. In criminal cases, considerations included the principles of justice, the rights of the accused, and the public interest. For civil matters, the court focused on the rights and obligations of the parties involved, as well as the equitable resolution of disputes. The outcome of each case would have been determined by the evidence presented, the legal arguments advanced, and the application of relevant law by the presiding judges.

The final orders made by the court would have varied depending on the nature and outcome of each individual case. In criminal proceedings, this could include bail decisions, remand orders, or sentences. For civil cases, the orders might have involved judgments on the merits, directions for further proceedings, or settlements.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established