Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 22 September 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 22 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
GKC
Vance Roy Lobban
Aaron James Irwin
Luke Andrew Irwin

For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)

For Legal Argument
AGG

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Stuart Malcolm Allen

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Expert Proofs/Refer to Mediation
Mollie Whish-Wilson by her litigation guardian Francis Whish-Wilson
v
The State of Tasmania and Anor

11:00 a.m.
Directions/Service of Documents
Boat Harbour Beach Blue Waters Pty Ltd
v
Matthews Properties Pty Ltd and Ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Toby Lloyd George

4:00pm For Mention by Video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Zannon Tony Howard

For Further Directions
Cameron James Brasher

For Plea
Colin Francis Watson

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00pm for Mention by Video Link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Zannon Tony Howard

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard by Justice Tennant on the 22nd of September, 2014. The case involved multiple defendants, including GKC, Vance, Roy Lobban, Aaron James Irwin, Luke Andrew Irwin, Jay John Bradford, Derek Michael Crosswell, and David Ian Charles Coles. The defendants were facing charges related to criminal jurisdiction, with some of the defendants having already been heard in part. The case was set for further mention and potential trial.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the proper procedures for handling criminal cases, including the management of part-heard cases and the scheduling of trials. The court needed to ensure that the defendants' rights were protected while also advancing the interests of justice by expediting the resolution of these criminal matters.

Justice Tennant addressed the procedural aspects of the case, ensuring that each defendant was aware of the status of their case and any upcoming deadlines. The court outlined the next steps for each defendant, providing clarity on the progression of the legal process. The outcome of the hearing was the continuation of the case with specific directives for each defendant, ensuring that the judicial process would move forward efficiently while adhering to legal standards.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established