SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 22 FEBRUARY 2016
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
Samuel David Pennicott
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Braedon Isaac Males
Stephen George Henderson
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Mark Sayer
v
Stephen John Brear
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Justin Richard Maynard
For Plea
Jonathan Paul Pearce
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Ashton Mitchell Gill
Matthew Charles Mogford
Jesse Rick Littlejohn
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Royden Sydney Bevin Swan
Emma Joan Swan
Bevin Irwin Swan
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Stuart Alexander Gallacher
For Trial
BSC
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Decision via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
James William Durston
v
Anti-Discrimination Tribunal
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court as in Chambers
For Decision via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
James William Durston v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
In Court
For Mention
Alissa Margaret Moore
Chantelle Jean Brent
To Follow
For Trial
Trent Edward Wing
4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Trevor Albert George
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 22 February 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 29
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 29
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases likely involved the interpretation and application of criminal and civil law, including the admissibility and weight of evidence, the application of legal precedents, and the determination of appropriate penalties or remedies. The court was required to decide on the validity of the claims and defenses presented, the legality of the proceedings, and the appropriateness of the sentences or outcomes proposed.
The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the court lists. The outcomes would depend on the specifics of each case, including the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the application of relevant laws and precedents. The court would have considered these factors to determine the appropriate resolution of each matter.
No final orders were detailed in the court lists. The outcomes of the cases would depend on the decisions made by the court after considering all the evidence and arguments presented. The court would have issued orders and judgments in accordance with the law and the facts of each case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.