Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 22 February 2016

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 22 FEBRUARY 2016

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
Samuel David Pennicott

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Braedon Isaac Males
Stephen George Henderson

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Mark Sayer
v
Stephen John Brear

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Justin Richard Maynard

For Plea
Jonathan Paul Pearce

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Ashton Mitchell Gill

Matthew Charles Mogford

Jesse Rick Littlejohn

4:00 p.m.

For Sentence

Royden Sydney Bevin Swan

Emma Joan Swan

Bevin Irwin Swan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Stuart Alexander Gallacher

For Trial
BSC

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Decision via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
James William Durston
v
Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court as in Chambers
For Decision via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
James William Durston v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
In Court
For Mention
Alissa Margaret Moore
Chantelle Jean Brent

To Follow
For Trial
Trent Edward Wing

4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Trevor Albert George

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of matters on Monday, 22 February 2016. In one of the cases, Samuel David Pennicott was scheduled to enter a plea in mitigation. The nature of the dispute was not specified, but it was a criminal matter. Another case involved Mark Sayer suing Stephen John Brear in a civil dispute, with a mention scheduled. Further down the list, Royden Sydney Bevin Swan and Emma Joan Swan Bevin Irwin Swan were scheduled for sentencing. The outcomes of these cases were not detailed in the court lists.

The legal issues in these cases likely involved the interpretation and application of criminal and civil law, including the admissibility and weight of evidence, the application of legal precedents, and the determination of appropriate penalties or remedies. The court was required to decide on the validity of the claims and defenses presented, the legality of the proceedings, and the appropriateness of the sentences or outcomes proposed.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the court lists. The outcomes would depend on the specifics of each case, including the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the application of relevant laws and precedents. The court would have considered these factors to determine the appropriate resolution of each matter.

No final orders were detailed in the court lists. The outcomes of the cases would depend on the decisions made by the court after considering all the evidence and arguments presented. The court would have issued orders and judgments in accordance with the law and the facts of each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established