Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 22 April 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 22 APRIL 2013

HOBART

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Plea via video link to Burnie
Nicholas John Flannery

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Burnie
Anthony Michael Mulkearns
Djuro MrGic
Taylor Lee Thomas
Dion Edward Brown
Kiahl Marki Roland
Nathan Gregory Coppleman
Gregory Richard Fox
ZRP
Jason Theo MacMillan
Adam James Orme
Stevan Dayle Johnston
Alan Robert Arkinstall

For Preliminary Proceedings Application via video link to Burnie
Scott Andrew Goodson
Patrick Michael Hennessy
Hayden Lee Fitzpatrick

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Mention

CLC
John Anthony George
David Laurence Crosswell
Adam Paul Alexander
Matthew James Coventry
Michael Edward Deering
ALJ

4.15 p.m.

For Sentence via video link to Launceston

Joshua Daniel Wilson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Plea
Daniel Luke Pelham

For Trial
David John Charles King
Luke William Garth
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Ivan Mercer
v
Allianz Australia Insurance Limited
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m.
Amend Defence
LA & ML Investments Pty Ltd
v
Artec Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Glen Bamford

For Trial
Cameron James Riley

4.00pm For Sentencing Submissions
Gerrard Enes Berberovic

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood by video-link from the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart

4.15pm For Sentence
Joshua Daniel Wilson

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
9:30 a.m.
For Plea by video link from Supreme Court, Hobart
Nicholas John Flannery

10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video link from Supreme Court, Hobart
Anthony Michael Mulkearns
Djuro MrGic
Taylor Lee Thomas
Dion Edward Brown
Kiahl Marki Roland
Nathan Gregory Coppleman
Gregory Richard Fox
ZRP
Jason Theo MacMillan
Adam James Orme
Stevan Dayle Johnston
Alan Robert Arkinstall

For Preliminary Proceedings Application by video link from Supreme Court, Hobart
Scott Andrew Goodson
Patrick Michael Hennessy
Hayden Lee Fitzpatrick

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened in various locations on Monday, 22 April 2013, to hear a range of criminal and civil cases. In Hobart, Justice Tennent presided over a number of criminal matters, including pleas, mentions, and preliminary proceedings applications, some of which were conducted via video link to Burnie. Justice Wood also presided over criminal mentions in Hobart, some via video link to Burnie. In Launceston, Justice Evans handled a mention and a trial, while Justice Wood heard sentencing submissions via video link from Hobart. In Burnie, Justice Tennent presided over a plea via video link from Hobart and several mentions, also conducted via video link to Hobart.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a variety of criminal proceedings, including pleas, mentions, preliminary proceedings applications, and sentencing. The court had to determine the outcomes of these cases, which ranged from pleas of guilty or not guilty to the handling of bail applications and sentencing submissions. The civil case involved a dispute between Ivan Mercer and Allianz Australia Insurance Limited, where the court was to hear part of the trial.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were determined by the specifics of the proceedings. For criminal cases, the court assessed pleas, granted or denied bail, and proceeded with mentions and trials as scheduled. Sentencing submissions were considered based on the evidence and arguments presented. In the civil case, the court listened to part of the trial and would continue to hear evidence and arguments to resolve the dispute between the parties.

The final orders of the court would be documented in the respective case files, detailing the outcomes of each hearing and any subsequent directions provided by the court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established