Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 21 December 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 21 DECEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Further Hearing

Darren John Fenton

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. via video link to Launceston
For Hearing
Susan Burge
v
Commonwealth Bank of Australia

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Darren John Fenton and the Commonwealth Bank of Australia was listed for a further hearing before Associate Justice Holt on 21 December 2015. The nature of the dispute is not detailed in the excerpt, but it is evident that it involves civil jurisdiction. The hearing was scheduled to take place via video link from Launceston, highlighting the court's commitment to accessibility and efficiency, especially for parties and witnesses located outside of Hobart.

The legal issues the court was required to decide remain unspecified in the text. However, the listing suggests that the case involves significant matters warranting a further hearing. The video link setup indicates the potential complexity or the need for remote participation of parties or evidence. The court's decision would likely address procedural or substantive legal matters pertinent to the case, including any interim orders or directions necessary for the progression of the litigation.

The court's reasoning and outcome are not provided in the excerpt. Typically, in such hearings, the court would consider the submissions from both parties, review any new evidence or legal arguments presented, and provide a decision that either advances the case to a final hearing or resolves specific interim issues. The nature of the decision would be documented in subsequent court records or judgments, which would detail the court's rationale and the specific orders made. This case exemplifies the court's role in managing the progression of civil litigation, ensuring that cases are heard fairly and efficiently.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established