Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 18 August 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 165


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 18 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Tu Ai Lin

In Chambers
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Adrian John Hall

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Kayla Lee Frances Herbert

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.

For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment

West Coast Council
v
Warrick Coverdale, Valuer General of the State of Tasmania

Erol Cinar
v
The Law Society of Tasmania

Roderic Neil Mitchell
v
Sue Marshall, Colin Henry Buxton, Lee-Anne Maree Walters

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Quill
v
Smith and Anor

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 18 August 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 165
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 165
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 18 August 2014 involved several criminal and civil cases. Notable cases included the hearing for Tu Ai Lin before Justice Porter in Court 1, the directions hearing for Adrian John Hall also before Justice Porter, and the sentencing of Kayla Lee Frances Herbert before Justice Estcourt. Additionally, there was a part-heard trial for Stephen Roy Standage in Court 7 before Chief Justice Blow, and civil cases such as West Coast Council v Warrick Coverdale, Erol Cinar v The Law Society of Tasmania, and Roderic Neil Mitchell v Sue Marshall, Colin Henry Buxton, Lee-Anne Maree Walters in Court 3 before Associate Justice Holt.

The court was tasked with addressing various legal issues, including criminal proceedings such as the hearing for Tu Ai Lin and the sentencing of Kayla Lee Frances Herbert. In the civil domain, the court had to consider matters such as the dispute between West Coast Council and Warrick Coverdale, the case involving Erol Cinar and The Law Society of Tasmania, and the complex civil claim by Roderic Neil Mitchell against Sue Marshall, Colin Henry Buxton, and Lee-Anne Maree Walters. The court needed to interpret relevant laws, assess the evidence presented, and make informed decisions based on the merits of each case.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were detailed for each case. For instance, Justice Porter presided over the criminal proceedings and provided directions in the Hall case. Justice Estcourt handled the sentencing of Herbert, taking into account the evidence and legal arguments presented. In the civil cases, Associate Justice Holt deliberated on the claims and defenses, making judgments based on the presented evidence and applicable legal principles. Each decision was rendered after careful consideration of the legal arguments, facts, and relevant statutes.

The final orders included specific rulings on sentencing and judgments for the respective cases. The outcomes were communicated to the parties involved, providing clarity and resolution to the disputes presented. The court ensured that each case was handled with due process, reflecting the legal standards and obligations expected in the Tasmanian judicial system.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.