SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 18 AUGUST 2014
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Tu Ai Lin
In Chambers
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Adrian John Hall
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Kayla Lee Frances Herbert
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
West Coast Council
v
Warrick Coverdale, Valuer General of the State of Tasmania
Erol Cinar
v
The Law Society of Tasmania
Roderic Neil Mitchell
v
Sue Marshall, Colin Henry Buxton, Lee-Anne Maree Walters
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Quill
v
Smith and Anor
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 18 August 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 165
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 165
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with addressing various legal issues, including criminal proceedings such as the hearing for Tu Ai Lin and the sentencing of Kayla Lee Frances Herbert. In the civil domain, the court had to consider matters such as the dispute between West Coast Council and Warrick Coverdale, the case involving Erol Cinar and The Law Society of Tasmania, and the complex civil claim by Roderic Neil Mitchell against Sue Marshall, Colin Henry Buxton, and Lee-Anne Maree Walters. The court needed to interpret relevant laws, assess the evidence presented, and make informed decisions based on the merits of each case.
The court's reasoning and outcomes were detailed for each case. For instance, Justice Porter presided over the criminal proceedings and provided directions in the Hall case. Justice Estcourt handled the sentencing of Herbert, taking into account the evidence and legal arguments presented. In the civil cases, Associate Justice Holt deliberated on the claims and defenses, making judgments based on the presented evidence and applicable legal principles. Each decision was rendered after careful consideration of the legal arguments, facts, and relevant statutes.
The final orders included specific rulings on sentencing and judgments for the respective cases. The outcomes were communicated to the parties involved, providing clarity and resolution to the disputes presented. The court ensured that each case was handled with due process, reflecting the legal standards and obligations expected in the Tasmanian judicial system.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.