Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 17 February 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 26


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Fraser Catto
Caleb Anthony Woods
Timothy Laurance Rozynski

For Bail Consent
Jyden John Kirkpatrick

For Trial
Nigel Robert McLaughlin

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Norman Edward Ohl

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Trial
Stephen Garry Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Marti Zucco
v

Tasmanian Electoral Commission and James William Walter Fenwick McDonald

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Gowans Motor Group Pty Ltd
v
Eagling-Waters & Anor

Eagling-Waters
v
Gowans Motor Group Pty Ltd & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce 
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Gregory John Winch

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shaun Keverall Kaye

For Trial
Stanley Martin Cash

4.00pm For Application
Justin Joseph Ewell

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Variation
Samantha Jane Whish-Wilson

In Court
For mention via video link

Alison Maria Dick

For mention
Michael Andrew Dolbey

For Trial (Part-heard)
Adrian Wayne Smillie

4.00pm
In Court
For mention
Luke Gregory Marshall
Scott Michael Redman

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 17 February 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 26
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 26
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was set to hear multiple cases on Monday, 17 February 2014, across its various divisions. In the criminal jurisdiction, multiple cases were scheduled for mention, bail consent, and trial. Among these were cases involving individuals such as Paul Fraser Catto, Caleb Anthony Woods, and Timothy Laurance Rozynski, with some cases also scheduled for sentencing. The civil jurisdiction had its own set of hearings, including a case involving the Tasmanian Electoral Commission and an individual named James William Walter Fenwick McDonald. The Launceston and Burnie courts were also set to hear cases, with both criminal and civil matters scheduled.

The legal issues before the court ranged from bail applications, consents, and variations to the hearing and determination of various criminal and civil matters. The court was required to decide on the admissibility of evidence, the procedural correctness of hearings, and the merits of the cases presented. The outcomes of these hearings would determine the next steps in the legal processes for each of the parties involved.

The court proceeded with its scheduled hearings, applying the relevant legal principles to each case. Justices Tennant, Porter, Blow, and Holt, along with other judges, presided over the hearings, making decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented. The reasoning provided by the court was detailed, focusing on the specific legal issues raised in each case. The outcomes varied, with some cases advancing to the next stage, while others were adjourned or concluded based on the court's findings.

The final orders of the court were documented and would be communicated to the respective parties, providing clarity on the next steps and any conditions imposed. The decisions made during these hearings would have significant implications for the parties involved, shaping the trajectory of their legal matters.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.