SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Fraser Catto
Caleb Anthony Woods
Timothy Laurance Rozynski
For Bail Consent
Jyden John Kirkpatrick
For Trial
Nigel Robert McLaughlin
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Norman Edward Ohl
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Garry Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Marti Zucco
v
Tasmanian Electoral Commission and James William Walter Fenwick McDonald
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Gowans Motor Group Pty Ltd
v
Eagling-Waters & Anor
Eagling-Waters
v
Gowans Motor Group Pty Ltd & Anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Gregory John Winch
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shaun Keverall Kaye
For Trial
Stanley Martin Cash
4.00pm For Application
Justin Joseph Ewell
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Variation
Samantha Jane Whish-Wilson
In Court
For mention via video link
Alison Maria Dick
For mention
Michael Andrew Dolbey
For Trial (Part-heard)
Adrian Wayne Smillie
4.00pm
In Court
For mention
Luke Gregory Marshall
Scott Michael Redman
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 17 February 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 26
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 26
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court ranged from bail applications, consents, and variations to the hearing and determination of various criminal and civil matters. The court was required to decide on the admissibility of evidence, the procedural correctness of hearings, and the merits of the cases presented. The outcomes of these hearings would determine the next steps in the legal processes for each of the parties involved.
The court proceeded with its scheduled hearings, applying the relevant legal principles to each case. Justices Tennant, Porter, Blow, and Holt, along with other judges, presided over the hearings, making decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented. The reasoning provided by the court was detailed, focusing on the specific legal issues raised in each case. The outcomes varied, with some cases advancing to the next stage, while others were adjourned or concluded based on the court's findings.
The final orders of the court were documented and would be communicated to the respective parties, providing clarity on the next steps and any conditions imposed. The decisions made during these hearings would have significant implications for the parties involved, shaping the trajectory of their legal matters.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.