Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 16 February 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 16 FEBRUARY 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Fabian James Ackerley Trueman

2:15 p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
QMT

For Plea
Desiree Simone Evans (aka Jetson)
Andrew Allan Purcell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Robert Frederick Bowden
Paul Victor Marshall

For Mention via video-link to Risdon Minimum
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst

For Mention
Yared Ayana Gebreselassie
Wayne Michael Lang
Stuart Alexander Ferguson
Michael James Arnold
Bradley Brian Cowen
Tanya Maree Silva
Ryan Michael Zmendak
Patrick John Daly
Nigel Keith Davie
Benjamin Michael Fama
Shaun Keven Sclater
Barry John King
Nathan Grant Chatters

For Bail Consent
Christopher James Gerrard

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Joshua James Williams

For Facts and Sentence
Adam Savill

For Plea
Daniel Joseph Williams
Nicholas Mark Stebbins
Luke Steven Brearley
Ian Bruce Rushton
Craig John Wilson

For Trial
Brett Nathan Webb

11:30 a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Ornella Mirella Santesso

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m. for Directions Hearing
Marco Daniel Rusterholz
David Ronald Morgan

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:30 a.m.
For Mention
Darren Maxwell Burge
v
Fiona Mei-Han Patterson

In Court
11:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Necilla Ann Barrett
v
Constable Annette Helen Wilson

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing/Security for Costs
Tasmanian Development and Resources
v
Tasmanian Organics Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Benjamin Thomas Lynch
Matthew James Coventry

For Trial
Josh Daniel Wilson

Glenn Clinton Shadgett

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Directions Hearing by video link
From Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Marco Daniel Rusterholz
David Ronald Morgan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Mention
Nicholas Mark Anderson
Andrew Michael Richardson
RAAS

For Trial (Part-heard)
KA

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

This matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The case involved a dispute between Darren Maxwell Burge and Fiona Mei-Han Patterson, which was heard before Justice Pearce. The primary issue in this case was whether the plaintiff had a valid claim against the defendant, and if so, what relief should be granted. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had acted negligently, resulting in damages.

The court considered the merits of the plaintiff's claim, examining the evidence presented by both parties. The court analysed the applicable law and determined whether the defendant's actions met the required standard of care. After careful consideration, the court found that the plaintiff had established a valid claim against the defendant. The court assessed the extent of the damages and determined the appropriate relief to be granted.

In conclusion, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff and awarded damages against the defendant. The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff a sum of money, reflecting the extent of the harm caused by the defendant's negligence. This decision provides clarity on the parties' legal rights and obligations, and offers a resolution to the dispute.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established