Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 15 October 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 15 OCTOBER 2012

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.00 a.m.

For Trial

Anton Christofer Colev

(Part Heard)

Before Justice EVANS

Civil Jurisdiction
In Chambers

4.30 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via Telephone

Sincled Investments Pty Ltd & Anor

Commissioner of State Revenue

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BLOW

Civil Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Directions Hearing
Moira Partridge v HCC and others

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Darryl Robert Howlin v Clarence City Council

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Davis
v
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

11.00 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Taglieri
v
Portfolio Investments Pty Ltd & Anor

Amend Statement of Claim
Leslie & Anor
v
Portfolio Investments Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Monday, 15 October 2012, the Supreme Court of Tasmania had several cases listed for hearing. One of the cases was Anton Christofer Cole, a criminal matter, which was heard before Justice Evans. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the excerpt. Another case, Sincled Investments Pty Ltd and others versus the Commissioner of State Revenue, was heard before Justice Blow for a directions hearing. The legal dispute involved tax-related issues. Moira Partridge v HCC and others and Darryl Robert Howlin v Clarence City Council were also listed for directions hearings before Associate Justice Holt. Civil matters involving amendments to statements of claim were scheduled before various judges, including Davis v Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority, Taglieri v Portfolio Investments Pty Ltd and Anor, and Leslie and Anor v Portfolio Investments Pty Ltd.

The court was required to address several legal issues, including the interpretation of tax laws in the case of Sincled Investments Pty Ltd and others versus the Commissioner of State Revenue, and the procedural aspects of amending statements of claim in the other civil matters. The court's role was to provide directions and ensure that the cases progressed in an orderly and efficient manner. Additionally, in the criminal matter of Anton Christofer Cole, the court had to consider the evidence and arguments presented to determine the outcome of the trial.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the excerpt provided. However, it is expected that the court would have provided directions and guidance to the parties involved in each case, ensuring that the legal processes were followed correctly. The court's role in the criminal case of Anton Christofer Cole would have involved assessing the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused.

No final orders were stated in the excerpt. The court's decisions in each case would have been documented in the respective case files, and any final orders or judgments would have been communicated to the parties involved. The directions and guidance provided by the court in the civil matters would have helped to facilitate the resolution of the disputes, while the outcome of the criminal trial would have determined the fate of Anton Christofer Cole.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established