Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 14 September 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 196


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 14 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Mention
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
A Legal Practitioner

9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Odette Lennane

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
The Queen
v
Russell David Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd
(part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Dawn Ruth Flower

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Daniel John Oakley

For Bail Consent
Shaun Anthony Thomas Joseph
Jamie Douglas Blowfield

For Trial
Tanya Maree Silva

4.00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
A Witness

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
Clinton Peter Raven

For Trial      
Brodie Leigh Price
(part-heard)   

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application by video link from
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Matthew John Upston

LAUNCESTON

COURT 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention

Jacob Adam Williams
Brett Andrew Kitchin
Cameron John Capodici

To Follow For Bail Consent
Matthew Zurbo

To Follow for Trial (Part-Heard)
Louise Jane Williams

4:00pm For Directions Hearing
Lokendra Singh

4:15pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application by video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Matthew John Upston

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 14 September 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 196
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 196
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Monday, 14 September 2015, with various cases listed for hearing. Notable among these was the case of the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania versus A Legal Practitioner, which was scheduled for mention in Court 1 at 9:45 a.m. The court was also set to hear the admission to the legal profession of Odette Lennane, further proceedings in the criminal trial of The Queen v Russell David Potter, and a bail application by video link for Matthew John Upston. These cases span civil and criminal jurisdictions, reflecting the court's broad mandate in overseeing both legal admissions and ongoing criminal proceedings.

The primary legal issues in these cases involved the regulation of legal practice, the admission of new legal practitioners, and the administration of justice in ongoing criminal matters. The court was required to determine whether the legal practitioner in question complied with the necessary standards for admission and to decide on bail applications and the continuation of trials. These issues are critical in maintaining the integrity of the legal profession and ensuring that justice is served efficiently and fairly.

In its proceedings, the court likely considered relevant statutes, case law, and the specific circumstances of each case. The outcome of the hearings would have depended on the evidence presented and the arguments made by the parties involved. The court's decisions in these cases would have direct implications for the individuals involved, as well as broader implications for the legal system's functioning.

The final orders issued by the court would detail the outcomes of each case, including any admissions, bail decisions, and directions for ongoing trials. These orders are crucial for the progression of the cases and for ensuring that justice is administered appropriately.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.