Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 14 April 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 14 APRIL 2014

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
11:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Danita Lee Williams
v
State of Tasmania

Not before 12:00 p.m.
Robin Glen Fahey
v
State of Tasmania

Denis Ross Tringrove
v
State of Tasmania

Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Terry Croft
v
State of Tasmania

11:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Emmanuel Kalis
V
Kingborough Council

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
JGJ
ZSS

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Stephen Garry George Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe

For Sentence
Troy Richard Vernon Lovell
Derrick Michael Crosswell

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
Strike out Claim / Amend Proceedings / Appoint Litigation Guardian
Mundy
v
Roberts Limited

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Danita Lee Williams has brought a case against the State of Tasmania before the Court of Criminal Appeal. Robin Glen Fahey and Denis Ross Tringrove have also filed separate cases against the State of Tasmania, all of which are scheduled to be heard before the same court. Terry Croft has filed an application against the State of Tasmania to be heard before the Full Court. Emmanuel Kalis has filed a case against Kingborough Council to be heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania before Justice Tennant. JGJ has a plea in mitigation hearing scheduled in the same court before Justice Porter. Stephen Garry, George Devine, and Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe are scheduled for sentencing before Justice Escourt, as are Troy Richard Vernon Lovell and Derrick Michael Crosswell. Caleb Anthony Paul Woods is also scheduled for sentencing in the same court. Stephen Roy Standage's trial is part-heard before Associate Justice Holt. Mundy has filed a case against Roberts Limited before the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Associate Justice Holt, and is scheduled for a hearing on striking out the claim, amending proceedings, and appointing a litigation guardian.

The legal issues before the Court of Criminal Appeal include the validity of the cases brought by Danita Lee Williams, Robin Glen Fahey, and Denis Ross Tringrove against the State of Tasmania. The application filed by Terry Croft against the State of Tasmania will also be considered. The plea in mitigation hearing for JGJ and the sentencing hearings for Emmanuel Kalis, Stephen Garry, George Devine, Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe, Troy Richard Vernon Lovell, Derrick Michael Crosswell, and Caleb Anthony Paul Woods will be determined. The part-heard trial of Stephen Roy Standage will continue, and the case of Mundy against Roberts Limited will be addressed regarding the striking out of the claim, amending proceedings, and appointing a litigation guardian.

The Court of Criminal Appeal will review the cases brought by Danita Lee Williams, Robin Glen Fahey, and Denis Ross Tringrove against the State of Tasmania, as well as the application filed by Terry Croft. The plea in mitigation for JGJ and the sentencing hearings for the other individuals will be decided based on the merits of each case. The part-heard trial of Stephen Roy Standage will proceed, and the case of Mundy against Roberts Limited will be addressed according to the court's determination on the striking out of the claim, amending proceedings, and appointing a litigation guardian. The final orders will be made based on the court's findings and the legal principles applied.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established