Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 13 April 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 13 APRIL 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before JUSTICE TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.

For Sentence

Jassy Lois Anglin
Michael John Anglin

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
BLH

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Facts, Plea in Mitigation and Sentence
Konstandinos Argeropoulos

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Hearing via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Graham Maitland Marshall
v
Retirement Benefits Fund Board

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Marco Daniel Rusterholz

4:00pm for Application
A Surety

To Follow For Bail Application
Nathan Henry John Riley

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Hearing (via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
Graham Maitland Marshall
v
Retirement Benefits Fund Board

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's Law Lists for Monday, 13 April 2015, featured a variety of cases in both criminal and civil jurisdictions. The court heard several criminal cases, including a sentencing matter for Jassy Lois Anglin, a bail application for BLH, and a sentencing plea for Konstandinos Argeropoulos. Each of these cases was presided over by different justices and scheduled at various times throughout the day. Civil matters were also on the agenda, with a hearing concerning Graham Maitland Marshall versus the Retirement Benefits Fund Board to be conducted via video link to Burnie.

The legal issues before the court ranged from sentencing and bail applications in the criminal cases to disputes over retirement benefits in the civil case. The court was tasked with considering the appropriate sentences for the convicted individuals, evaluating the circumstances for bail applications, and resolving the financial disputes between the parties in the civil case.

In the sentencing cases, the justices had to weigh the circumstances of the offences and the backgrounds of the offenders in determining appropriate sentences. For the bail application, the court needed to assess whether the applicant met the criteria for bail, considering factors such as the likelihood of the applicant appearing in court, the risk of flight, and any potential danger to the community. In the civil case, the court's role was to interpret and apply the relevant laws and evidence to decide on the entitlements of the parties involved.

The outcomes of the cases would be determined by the court's findings and decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented. The final orders would reflect the court's resolutions on the matters before it, including sentences, bail conditions, or rulings in the civil dispute.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established