Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 12 August 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 12 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Melissa Mollross
Jared Joseph Broadby
Mark William Eather
Cleophas Turagendanwa
Bevan William Parkinson
Peter Edward Kreiner
Arvind Ravinesh Prasad

For Discharge
Warren Leslie Norman Hill

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
LBS
Aaron James Irwin
Mathew Stephen Henley
Corey Adam Triffitt
Daniel Sean Pennicott
Jamie Reginald Hall
Aaron John Stebbings
Steven Albert Thomas

For Decision
Zeb Judge Hovington

For Remand
BAS

For Hearing
TLD

2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Steven James Febey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Tu Ai Lin

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For Submissions via video link to Burnie
Darrel Francis Saward

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Admission to the Legal Profession
Ming Yong Lee

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Clint Graeme Stanisz
Craig Michael Watts
Jason Peter Eversham

For Trial
Beaumont Allan Cowdery

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

4.15 p.m. For Submissions (Video Link to Hobart)

Darrel Francis Saward

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania listed several matters for hearing on 12 August 2013. In Court 7, a variety of criminal cases were set for mention, discharge, and preliminary proceedings. These included cases against Melissa Mollross, Jared Joseph Broadby, Mark William Eather, Cleophas Turagendanwa, Bevan William Parkinson, Peter Edward Kreiner, Arvind Ravinesh Prasad, Warren Leslie Norman Hill, Elias Maffeking Kefalianos, and LBS. Zeb Judge Hovington was listed for a decision, while Steven James Febey had an application set for hearing. In Court 8, Tu Ai Lin was scheduled for legal argument, and Darrel Francis Saward was set for submissions via video link to Burnie. In Launceston, Clint Graeme Stanisz, Craig Michael Watts, and Jason Peter Eversham had cases listed for mention, and Beaumont Allan Cowdery was scheduled for trial.

The legal issues varied across these cases, but primarily involved criminal proceedings and applications related to bail, discharge, and preliminary hearings. For example, the court would need to consider whether the accused individuals met the criteria for bail, discharge, or if preliminary proceedings were warranted. The court's role was to review the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence to make informed decisions.

The reasoning and outcomes of the hearings would depend on the specifics of each case, including the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by both parties. The court's decisions would be guided by relevant statutory provisions and case law. For instance, in bail applications, the court would consider factors such as the strength of the evidence, the risk of flight or reoffending, and the interests of justice. In discharge applications, the court would examine whether the prosecution had sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. The final orders would reflect the court's determinations on these issues, whether that be granting or denying bail, discharging the accused, or proceeding to trial.

In summary, the court was set to address a range of criminal matters, including bail applications, discharge applications, and preliminary hearings. The court's decisions would be based on a careful consideration of the evidence and legal arguments presented. The outcomes would determine the next steps in each case, whether that be the continuation of the proceedings or the release of the accused.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established