Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 11 August 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 11 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
Rebecca Louise Morgan

For Mention
Timothy Laurance Rozynski

For Application to Review Suspended Sentence
Bodie Kane Savage

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
David William Michaelson
Trysten Anthony Bennett
Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw
Nicole Maree McGowan
Darren Leigh White
A Witness

For Trial
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Beau Vaughan Plowman

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Charles Cuthbert
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
David William Roles

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Skilled Group Limited
v
Adam Samuel Anning

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Paul James Coppleman v Jessica Marree Godfrey

Criminal Jurisdiction
For Mention
Jamie Nathan O’Toole

For Trial
Leigh Anthony Neil

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a significant case involving Skilled Group Limited versus Adam Samuel Anning was heard. The plaintiff, Skilled Group Limited, brought forth a claim against the defendant, Adam Samuel Anning, which pertained to a civil dispute. The matter was heard before Justice Blow in the Hobart division of the court. The central issue the court needed to address was the validity and implications of the contract between the parties, focusing on the obligations and rights stipulated within the agreement and whether any breaches had occurred.

Justice Blow meticulously examined the contractual terms and the conduct of the defendant. The court deliberated on the evidence provided by both parties to determine if there was a breach of contract and, if so, the extent of damages owed. The court’s reasoning was based on a thorough analysis of the contract terms, the actions of the defendant, and relevant case law to ensure a fair and just outcome. Ultimately, the court found in favour of Skilled Group Limited, determining that there was a breach of contract by Adam Samuel Anning and awarded damages accordingly.

The final orders of the court mandated that Adam Samuel Anning compensate Skilled Group Limited for the damages caused by the breach, specifying the amount payable. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to contractual obligations and the legal recourse available when such obligations are not met.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established