SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 10 AUGUST 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jamie Leigh Feil
For Trial
Jamie Reginald Hall
BLH
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Joseph Aaron Lattimer
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
JWA
Brent Humphrey
For Trial
Joshua-Ty Laredo
2:15 p.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Robert Raymond Kaye
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Special Hearing
SJB
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Gail Burnett
v
Anthony Fitzgerald and Roland Browne
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Shaun Keverall Kaye
MNH
To Follow for Trial
Tristan Andrew Tuthill
4:00pm For Mention
Tiffany Louise Shaw
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am for Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Raymond Roland
10 am for Mention
Ryan Dean Wing
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 10 August 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 165
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 165
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the determination of guilt in ongoing trials, the imposition of sentences for convicted individuals, and the scheduling and progress of various cases. The court needed to ensure that the proceedings were conducted in accordance with the law, including the consideration of any legal arguments presented by the parties and the application of relevant legal principles to the facts of each case.
The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the document, but it was evident that the court was proceeding with the scheduled hearings and mentions as per the listed cases. Each case would have been subject to the specific legal arguments and evidence presented, with the court's role being to adjudicate on the matters brought before it.
No final orders were noted in the document, but it can be expected that the court would issue orders relevant to the outcomes of the hearings, including any sentences, dismissals, or directions for further proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.