Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 1 June 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 1 JUNE 2015

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Scott Wilkie
v
Margaret Dawn Taylor

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:30 p.m.
For Bail Variation
James Ernest Davey

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
Order to show cause
Howlin
v
Resource Management Planning Appeal & Ors

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a hearing in Hobart on Monday, 1 June 2015, with Scott Wilkie bringing a claim against Margaret Dawn Taylor. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the provided excerpt, but it is clear that the case was assigned to Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The court's decision was to be delivered by the full court, indicating the importance or complexity of the case.

The legal issues that the court had to decide were not explicitly stated in the provided excerpt, but the assignment of the case to the full court suggests that it might involve significant legal questions or precedent. The court was required to interpret and apply the relevant laws to the facts of the case, and determine the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the excerpt. In a typical legal proceeding, the court would have considered the evidence presented by both parties, applied the relevant laws, and made a decision based on the merits of the case. The court might have found in favour of one party or the other, or it might have made an order that requires further action or compliance by the parties.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the provided excerpt. In a typical legal proceeding, the court would have made orders that reflect its decision, which might include a judgment in favour of one party or the other, or an order that requires further action or compliance by the parties. The court might also have made orders relating to costs, interest, or other matters that are relevant to the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established