SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY 1 DECEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aaron John Stebbings
A Surety
Peter Matthew Yost
Craig Aaron Castle
Not before 11:30am
For Plea
Nicholas Aaron Cernigoi
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ethan Scott Cooper
DKM
For Bail Consent
Nicholas David McWilliams
For Trial
Christopher Paul Minehan
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
11:15 a.m.
For Trial
Paul Francis Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Sean Gregory Richardson
Damien Wesley Marshall
Coby Wells
Ben Jonas
Nicholas Mark Bull
For Trial
Jamie Nathan O’Toole
11:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Darryl Scott Donohue
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
RAAS
v
Allira Jai Johnson
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jamie Lawrence Carrick
James Ryan Wolfe
For Preliminary Proceedings Indication
MJJ
AGB
Corey William Stafford
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
John Anthony Evernett
For Trial
Brett Richard Jackson
Tara Jayne Stokes
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday 1 December 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 257
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 257
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining the validity of Mr. Allison's claims and assessing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The reasoning of the court would involve interpreting the applicable laws and applying them to the facts of the case to reach a decision on the merits of the claims. The outcome would depend on the findings of fact and the legal conclusions drawn by the court. Given the nature of civil litigation, the court's decision could result in a variety of outcomes, including a ruling in favour of one party or the other, or potentially a settlement or dismissal of the case.
The final orders of the court would be documented in the judgment or written reasons, which would provide detailed explanations of the court's findings and conclusions. These orders would be binding on the parties and would outline any remedies or further actions required. The exact content of the final orders would be determined based on the court's deliberations and the legal principles applied during the trial.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.