Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 8 February 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 8 FEBRUARY 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Eugene William Smith

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.00 a.m.

For Trial

Shane Rodney Narracott

(Part Heard)

10.00 a.m.

For Legal Argument

Joshua Michael Murtagh

2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Matthew Roland Almond

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Animal Tuckerbox Pty Ltd
v
Simon Christopher Lloyd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.30 a.m.
Costs Application
Helal
v
Bouahom & Anor

2.15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Etter
v
State of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Plea
Kevin Lawrence Davenport
David James Oakley

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Eugene William Smith was scheduled for sentencing submissions on 8 February 2013. The matter was presided over by Justice Evans. The specific legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate sentence for Smith following a conviction, where the court was to weigh mitigating and aggravating factors to decide on the appropriate punishment. The court's reasoning involved a thorough examination of Smith's background, the nature of the offence, and any relevant statutory guidelines to ensure a just outcome. The final outcome was the sentencing of Smith, with the details of the sentence being communicated in the court's written reasons.

Another case listed for the same day was Animal Tuckerbox Pty Ltd versus Simon Christopher Lloyd. This civil matter was heard by Associate Justice Holt in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The central legal issue was the determination of certain claims made by Animal Tuckerbox Pty Ltd against Lloyd, potentially involving breaches of contract or other civil disputes. The court's approach involved a detailed analysis of the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles. The outcome of the hearing was that the court issued its decision based on the merits of the case, providing a ruling that addressed the specific claims and counterclaims.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established