Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 8 April 2016

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 8 APRIL 2016

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT

10:00 a.m.

For Hearing

Michael Pervan, Acting Secretary Department of Health and Human Services

The Honourable Chief Justice Alan Blow

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
10:00 a.m.
Civil Jurisdiction
For Application
Senior Constable Scott Wilkie
v
Christian Peter Cohen

To Follow
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Variation
Michelle Lee Arnott

In Court
For Application to Discharge Dangerous Criminal Declaration via video link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
Winston Fairbrother

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jason Robert Burns

In Court as in Chambers
10:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Jack William Court

In Court
2:00 p.m.
For Remand via video link to Launceston Remand Centre
Chad Richard Talbott

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jason Robert Burns

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
10:00 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
For Application to Discharge Dangerous Criminal Declaration via video link to Court 7, Supreme Court, Hobart
Winston Fairbrother

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on the 8th of April, 2016. In one of the cases, Michael Pervan, Acting Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, was the applicant, and The Honourable Chief Justice Alan Blow was the respondent. The case was heard in the Hobart Court, presided over by Chief Justice Blow. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the document, but it was heard under civil jurisdiction.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide were not explicitly stated in the document. However, given that the case was heard under civil jurisdiction, it is likely that the court had to consider issues related to the Health and Human Services department, such as administrative law, public health, or health care policy. The court was also required to determine the appropriate outcome for the case based on the evidence and arguments presented.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not specified in the document. However, given that the case was heard by Chief Justice Blow, it is likely that the court considered the relevant legal principles and precedents before reaching a decision. The outcome of the case may have been influenced by factors such as the strength of the arguments presented, the quality of the evidence, and the applicable legal standards.

If the case was decided in favour of the Acting Secretary, the court may have ordered the respondent to take certain actions or refrain from taking certain actions related to the Health and Human Services department. Alternatively, if the case was decided in favour of the respondent, the court may have ordered the Acting Secretary to take certain actions or refrain from taking certain actions. The final orders of the court would have been communicated to the parties involved in the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established