SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 7 MARCH 2014
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Consent Orders
Athol Charles Jackson and Maureen Faye Jackson
v
Mark Purton and Judith Purton & anor
For Hearing
John Desmond Briers
v
Skilled Group Limited
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Judgment
Jesse Luke Kent
v
Grace Ellen Payne
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11:00 a.m.
Directions/Amend Statement of Claim/Discovery
Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport & Anor
2:15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
PSAL Pty Ltd
v
Galilee & Ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce by video-link from Court 2, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am For Judgment
Jesse Luke Kent v Grace Ellen Payne
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 7 March 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 41
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 41
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in Jesse Luke Kent v Grace Ellen Payne, presided over by Associate Justice Holt, were not explicitly stated in the court list. However, the case was scheduled for judgment via video link to Burnie, indicating that it may involve complex matters requiring detailed legal analysis. The case Masters v Dobson Mitchell & Allport & Anor was set for an amendment to the statement of claim and discovery, suggesting that it might involve disputes over the adequacy or accuracy of the initial claim or the need for further evidence. In the case of PSAL Pty Ltd v Galilee & Ors, the court was to hear miscellaneous civil business, likely involving various civil matters that needed to be addressed.
The court proceedings on this day covered a range of civil matters, from consent orders and judgments to amendments in statements of claim and discovery. Each case had its unique procedural requirements and legal complexities, as evidenced by the specific arrangements for hearings, such as video links and amendments to claims. The outcomes of these hearings would be essential for resolving the disputes between the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.