Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 7 March 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 7 MARCH 2014

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT

10:00 a.m.
For Consent Orders
Athol Charles Jackson and Maureen Faye Jackson
v
Mark Purton and Judith Purton & anor

For Hearing
John Desmond Briers
v
Skilled Group Limited

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Judgment
Jesse Luke Kent
v
Grace Ellen Payne

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
Directions/Amend Statement of Claim/Discovery
Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport & Anor

2:15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
PSAL Pty Ltd
v
Galilee & Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce by video-link from Court 2, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am For Judgment
Jesse Luke Kent v Grace Ellen Payne

BURNIE

No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened for a series of hearings on Friday, 7 March 2014, in various locations, including Hobart and Launceston. One of the cases scheduled was Jackson and Jackson v Purton and Purton, which was set for consent orders. This case involved a dispute between the Jacksons and the Purtons, though the specific nature of the conflict was not detailed in the court list. Another case, Briers v Skilled Group Limited, was also scheduled for a hearing in Court 2 in Hobart, with Justice Pearce presiding over the civil jurisdiction matter. The details of the dispute were not provided in the court list.

The legal issues in Jesse Luke Kent v Grace Ellen Payne, presided over by Associate Justice Holt, were not explicitly stated in the court list. However, the case was scheduled for judgment via video link to Burnie, indicating that it may involve complex matters requiring detailed legal analysis. The case Masters v Dobson Mitchell & Allport & Anor was set for an amendment to the statement of claim and discovery, suggesting that it might involve disputes over the adequacy or accuracy of the initial claim or the need for further evidence. In the case of PSAL Pty Ltd v Galilee & Ors, the court was to hear miscellaneous civil business, likely involving various civil matters that needed to be addressed.

The court proceedings on this day covered a range of civil matters, from consent orders and judgments to amendments in statements of claim and discovery. Each case had its unique procedural requirements and legal complexities, as evidenced by the specific arrangements for hearings, such as video links and amendments to claims. The outcomes of these hearings would be essential for resolving the disputes between the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established