Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 7 June 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 7 JUNE 2013

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Tristian Haugland
Leesa Nicole Tovey

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Nicole Maree McGowan
Samuel David William Maple
Luke Anthony Shaw

11.00 a.m.
For Sentence
Samuel Spencer Madden

4.00 p.m.
For Sentence
Melissa Rose Connors
Giulio White

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Hearing

Kevin Laurence Davenport
v
Sergeant Gary Lusted

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10.30 a.m.
Set Aside Judgment
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
v
Hardwick

12.00 p.m.
Expert Proofs/Rule 261 Schedule
Reardon & Ors
v
Moore & Ors

CEREMONIAL SITTING

There will be a special ceremonial sitting to mark the retirement of the Honourable Justice Peter Evans in the No 1 Civil Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart at 2.15 pm on Friday, 7 June 2013.

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on 7 June 2013, with several matters scheduled across different courts and jurisdictions. The hearing of Kevin Laurence Davenport v. Sergeant Gary Lusted stood out as a significant civil matter, which was to be heard in Court 3 before Associate Justice Holt. The nature of the dispute in this case was not specified in the provided text, but it involved a plaintiff, Davenport, and a defendant, Lusted, who was represented by a sergeant. This case likely involved issues of civil liability or public law, given the involvement of a police officer.

The legal issues before the court in Davenport v. Lusted would have revolved around the merits of Davenport's claims against Lusted. The court would have needed to determine whether Davenport's claims were substantiated by the evidence presented, and whether any statutory or common law principles applied in favour of either party. Given the specifics of the case were not provided, the exact nature of the claims could have included allegations of negligence, misuse of authority, or other civil wrongs.

The court's reasoning and outcome in the case were not detailed in the provided text. However, the proceedings would have involved an examination of the evidence, legal arguments from both parties, and an application of relevant law to the facts. The Associate Justice would have considered all submissions and evidence to arrive at a decision. The outcome could have ranged from a dismissal of Davenport's claims, an order for damages, or other remedies depending on the court's findings. The final orders of the court would have been communicated following the hearing.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established