Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday 7 February 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY 7 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
JLF
Michael Ian Wilson

For Withdrawal of Notice of Appeal
MDM

For Plea
Lyn Sticpewich

For Sentence
Kris Oliver Powell

Not Before 11:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Joseph Andrew Edwards
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial

Troy Richard Vernon Lovell
Derrick Michael Crosswell
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Adrian Howard James Hall
v
Jayne Louise Hall
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Ruling
Cassandra Anne Price
v
Southern Cross Television (TNT9) Pty Ltd & Anor

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel Johnston Russell
v
Hongfei Chu
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial
Roger Edwin Fidler

2.15pm For Sentence
David John Cronin

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court
For Trial (Part-heard)
Justin James Lange
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania is set to hear several cases on 7 February 2014, spread across various courts in Hobart and Launceston. The cases cover both criminal and civil jurisdictions, with proceedings ranging from trials and sentences to rulings and appeals. Among the cases listed, one notable civil matter is Cassandra Anne Price versus Southern Cross Television (TNT9) Pty Ltd & Anor, before Justice Wood in Court 1, Hobart, which is scheduled for a ruling. This case likely involves issues of media law or privacy, given the defendant's name. Another significant case is the criminal trial of Troy Richard Vernon Lovell and Derrick Michael Crosswell, heard in Court 8, Hobart, before Justice Porter. This trial could involve serious criminal offences, given the presence of multiple defendants. Additionally, Adrian Howard James Hall is suing Jayne Louise Hall in a civil trial before Justice Porter in Court 1, Hobart, indicating a possible dispute over property or contractual obligations.

The legal issues before the court span a variety of subjects, from the interpretation of media laws and privacy rights to the sentencing of criminal defendants and the resolution of civil disputes. In the case of Cassandra Anne Price versus Southern Cross Television, the court must determine whether the television company breached privacy laws or defamed the plaintiff. For the criminal cases, the court will need to consider the evidence presented and decide on the guilt of the defendants, as well as appropriate sentences. In the civil trial between Adrian Howard James Hall and Jayne Louise Hall, the court will need to interpret the relevant laws and evidence to determine the outcome of the dispute.

The reasoning and outcome of each case will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. For the civil case concerning media law, Justice Wood will likely examine the relevant statutes and case law to determine whether the television company's actions were lawful. In the criminal trials, Justice Porter and others will assess the credibility of witnesses and the strength of the prosecution's case to decide on the defendants' guilt and appropriate sentences. In the civil dispute between the Hall parties, Justice Porter will need to evaluate the evidence and apply relevant legal principles to resolve the matter. The final orders will be determined based on these assessments, ensuring that justice is served according to the law.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania is set to deliver its rulings and sentences following the hearings. In the civil case involving media law, the court will issue a ruling on whether the television company is liable for any breaches. In the criminal cases, the sentences will be pronounced based on the court's findings of guilt and the applicable sentencing principles. For the civil dispute between the Hall parties, the court will deliver a decision that resolves the issues between the parties. These outcomes will provide clarity and resolution to the respective disputes, ensuring that the law is upheld in each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established