SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 6 JULY 2012
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Trial
IPP
(Part Heard)
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Donna Lee Dennison
2.00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Thomas Rundle Mead
2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Craig Douglas Allen
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Aaron James Grant
Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Jeffrey Grimme
v
M & M Wall and Central Coast Council
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
3.30 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment
Emma Harrex
v
Alana Hall-King
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11.00 a.m.
Renew Writ
Pavy
V
State of Tasmania & Anor
(Part Heard)
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Mention
DSI
For Trial
William Tyler Frame
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 6 July 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 122
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 122
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the sentencing of Craig Douglas Allen and the resolution of the civil dispute between Emma Harrex and Alana Hall-King. In the criminal proceedings, the court would consider the appropriate sentence for Allen, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, as well as any mitigating or aggravating factors. In the civil case, the court was required to determine the liability and potential damages between the two parties, based on the evidence and arguments presented.
The court's reasoning and outcome in these cases were not detailed in the provided document, but the court was expected to deliver judgments and sentences in accordance with the law and the facts of each case. The final orders would be communicated to the parties involved and would be subject to any appeals or reviews as permitted by law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.