Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 6 July 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 6 JULY 2012

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Trial
IPP
(Part Heard)

10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Donna Lee Dennison

2.00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Thomas Rundle Mead

2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Craig Douglas Allen

In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application
Aaron James Grant

Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Jeffrey Grimme
v
M & M Wall and Central Coast Council

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
3.30 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment
Emma Harrex
v
Alana Hall-King

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.00 a.m.
Renew Writ
Pavy
V
State of Tasmania & Anor
(Part Heard)

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Mention
DSI

For Trial
William Tyler Frame

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, several cases were listed for the Hobart sitting on Friday, 6 July 2012. Notable among them was the criminal case of Craig Douglas Allen, which was scheduled for sentencing, and the civil case of Emma Harrex against Alana Hall-King, which was scheduled for judgment. The court was also set to hear a bail application from Thomas Rundle Mead and another from Aaron James Grant. Additionally, the court was to deliver judgment in the case of Jeffrey Grimm against M & M Wall and Central Coast Council.

The legal issues before the court included the sentencing of Craig Douglas Allen and the resolution of the civil dispute between Emma Harrex and Alana Hall-King. In the criminal proceedings, the court would consider the appropriate sentence for Allen, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, as well as any mitigating or aggravating factors. In the civil case, the court was required to determine the liability and potential damages between the two parties, based on the evidence and arguments presented.

The court's reasoning and outcome in these cases were not detailed in the provided document, but the court was expected to deliver judgments and sentences in accordance with the law and the facts of each case. The final orders would be communicated to the parties involved and would be subject to any appeals or reviews as permitted by law.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established