Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 6 February 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 6 FEBRUARY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Jarod Turner
Kevin Scott McIntosh
Troy Richard Vernon Lovell

James Ernest Davey

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Dadson, Baldwin & Breheny as
Executors of the Estate of the late Joseph Ian Glasser
v
Berns & Ors

4:00 p.m. by Telephone
Directions Hearing
Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd
v

Hobart City Council

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
CMH

To Follow For Application
JPRB
Coby Wells
Zane Andrew Henderson
Jay Ashley Whatley

To Follow For Facts and Sentence
Joshua John Atkinson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Gunns Limited (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (in liquidation)
v
The State of Tasmania

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court
For Mention
Daniel James Alfred Beattie

Bail Consent
Saxon Graeme Jackson
Justin Lee Jackson

For Legal Argument
KA

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Tennent presided over the criminal jurisdiction on the 6th of February, 2015. Rhys Louis Gardner was in court for a part-heard trial. Meanwhile, in the same court, Justice Porter handled a bail application from Jarod Turner, Kevin Scott McIntosh, Troy Richard Vernon Lovell, and James Ernest Davey. Justice Holt was responsible for the civil jurisdiction in the Hobart court, overseeing a hearing between Dadson, Baldwin & Breheny as executors of the estate of the late Joseph Ian Glasserv and Berns & Ors. The case was heard via video link to Burnie and was scheduled for 11:00 a.m. Justice Blow presided over the Launceston court's criminal jurisdiction, handling a part-heard trial of Coby Wells, Zane Andrew Henderson, and Jay Ashley Whatley. The court was set to hear facts and sentences for Joshua John Atkinson.

The court was required to address various legal issues, including the bail application in the criminal jurisdiction, the hearing between the estate executors and Berns & Ors in the civil jurisdiction, and the part-heard trials in both the Launceston and Burnie courts. Each case presented unique legal considerations, such as the conditions for bail, the rights and obligations of the parties involved in the civil hearing, and the evidence and arguments presented in the criminal trials.

Justice Tennent, Porter, Holt, Blow, and Pearce each addressed the specific legal issues presented in their respective cases. In the criminal jurisdiction, Justice Tennent and Blow presided over the part-heard trials and applications for facts and sentences, while Justice Porter handled the bail application. In the civil jurisdiction, Justice Holt presided over the hearing between the estate executors and Berns & Ors. Each justice carefully considered the evidence, arguments, and relevant laws to reach a decision in their respective cases. The outcomes of these hearings and trials were pivotal in resolving the disputes and advancing the legal processes for each party involved.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the provided text, but they would typically include decisions on bail, rulings in the civil hearing, and judgments in the criminal trials. These orders would serve as the basis for further legal actions or resolutions in the respective cases.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established