Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 31 October 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 31 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Mention
Vance Roy Lobban

For Facts and Sentence
Jason Charles Dare

For Sentence
BCK

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial

Gregory Patrick Kotynia-English
(Part Heard)

4:15p.m.
For Mention via video link
Scott Clifford Mitchell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Tye Matthew Curtain
(Part Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
David John Hurd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Disputed Facts Hearing
Cameron James Brasher

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiciton
10:00am For Trial
Nicholas Charles Pitt

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of cases on Friday, October 31, 2014, spanning both civil and criminal matters. Among the criminal cases listed was that of Tye Matthew Curtain, who faced a trial in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, presided over by Justice Estcourt. Curtain's trial was part heard, indicating that it was ongoing and would likely continue on subsequent days.

The legal issues before the court in Curtain's case likely involved the interpretation and application of criminal statutes relevant to the charges against him. The court's decision would have hinged on the admissibility of evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and the application of legal principles to the facts of the case. The outcome would have depended on whether the prosecution successfully established the elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt.

Justice Estcourt, in delivering the court's reasoning and outcome, would have considered the evidence presented, the arguments from both the prosecution and defence, and relevant legal precedents. The final orders would have reflected the court's determination on the charges against Curtain, which could have ranged from a conviction and sentencing to an acquittal if the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established