Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 3 October 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Hobart Country Club & Gold Resort Pty Ltd
v
Peishan Li

12:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing/Set Down for Trial
Tanya Percey & Ors
v
Benjamin Scott as Trustee of the Estate of the late Leo Maxwell Percey & Anor

Gerald Percey
v
Julie Whitney and Anor

LAUNCESTON
No law list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case between Hobart Country Club & Gold Resort Pty Ltd and Peishan Li on 3 October 2014. The nature of the dispute involved contractual obligations and potential breaches. The court was tasked with addressing whether the respondent, Peishan Li, had fulfilled the terms of an agreement with the applicant, Hobart Country Club & Gold Resort Pty Ltd, and whether there were any grounds for the applicant to seek relief in relation to the contract. This matter was set for a directions hearing and potential trial setting.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the interpretation of the contractual terms, the extent of the obligations of the parties, and the identification of any breaches. The applicant sought to understand the respondent's compliance with the contract and to determine if any remedies were available for non-performance or alleged breaches. The respondent, in turn, would need to demonstrate adherence to the contractual terms or provide justification for any deviations.

Associate Justice Holt presided over the hearing and provided directions for the parties to further define the scope of the issues and prepare for a potential trial. The court outlined the procedural steps necessary for both parties to present their cases effectively. The outcome of the directions hearing was that further steps would be taken to clarify the issues and schedule the trial date. The court's decision was to continue the case for a more detailed examination of the contractual obligations and any breaches that may have occurred.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established