Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 3 July 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 136


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 3 JULY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Natasha Lee Scott

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Jonathon Hay

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
Enter Judgment
Bass Oil & Gas Pty Ltd
v
David Bendall

12:30 p.m.
Set Timetable
Michael Ewing & Anor
v
Gary Howes & Ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jay David Blazely
Mitchell Clay Dowling

10:00am For Sentence
Michael Rodney Smith

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 3 July 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 136
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 136
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a matter concerning an application for bail was heard before Associate Justice Holt. The applicant, Jonathon Hay, sought relief from detention pending resolution of his legal proceedings. The nature of the dispute revolved around Hay's eligibility for bail and the conditions that should be imposed if bail were to be granted. The court had to assess the risk Hay posed to the community, the likelihood of his appearance in court, and any other relevant factors impacting the decision.

The legal issues before the court included the standard criteria for bail under the Bail Act, the specifics of Hay's case, and the evidence presented regarding his potential flight risk and the circumstances of the alleged offence. The court was required to weigh the presumption in favour of bail against the need to protect the community and ensure the fairness of the judicial process. Associate Justice Holt meticulously examined the evidence, including character references and the nature of the alleged crime, to determine whether bail should be granted and, if so, under what conditions.

After thorough deliberation, Associate Justice Holt decided that Jonathon Hay should be granted bail. The decision was influenced by the character evidence presented, the relatively minor nature of the alleged offence, and the absence of any significant flight risk. Specific conditions were imposed to ensure Hay's appearance in court and to protect the community. These conditions included a requirement for Hay to reside at a specified address, to report to a police station on a regular basis, and to surrender any travel documents. The court's ruling aimed to balance Hay's right to liberty with the need for public safety and the integrity of the legal process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.